
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-71
the CERP can not function as source of additional water to the WCAs or ENP
without extensive modification and likely substantially increased cost (compared
to original designs and cost estimates).
Furthermore, since the land for this project has already been acquired by the
Federal Government and the State of Florida for ecosystem restoration in South
Florida, and further considering that implementation of additional storage at the
project location will immediately result in the ability to reduce the harmful
effects of high water levels on the littoral zone in Lake Okeechobee and reduce
the magnitude and frequency of regulatory releases from to the Caloosahatchee
and St. Lucie estuaries, the immediate, independent beneficial effects of the
EAA Storage Reservoirs project justify project implementation, even if no other
CERP projects are authorized or implemented. In fact, the need for additional
regional storage at this location to accomplish these objectives is so acute that
the State of Florida has begun advance design and construction work on a
component of this project through its "Acceler8" program; initial construction on
the Acceler8 project is scheduled to begin in 2006.
5.7.1 Risk and Uncertainty
As noted in section 5.4.2.1.4.1, once existing constraints on operations are
reduced and/or eliminated such that additional water could be delivered in a
manner consistent with restoration goals, total volumes of water made available
by the EAA Reservoir project for introduction to the Everglades Protection Area
are anticipated to be greater than existing levels. Because the volumes of water
delivered into the Everglades Protection Area under “restored” conditions are
likely to be greater than existing volumes, it is possible that additional STA
optimization and/or capacity might be required to handle the additional
hydraulic and nutrient loading rates associated with CERP-like deliveries. The
potential need for additional STA optimization and/or capacity is being
investigated including development of Planning level cost estimate in the Final
PIR
5.8 TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS
Habitat units were weighed equally and summed to arrive at total habitat unit
outputs for each alternative. This method takes into consideration the trade-offs
in environmental performance for each of the natural system areas evaluated to
achieve the best possible overall beneficial effect that can be achieved with a
single optimized reservoir plan.
Comentários a estes Manuais