Wenger 72944 Especificações Página 195

  • Descarregar
  • Adicionar aos meus manuais
  • Imprimir
  • Página
    / 386
  • Índice
  • MARCADORES
  • Avaliado. / 5. Com base em avaliações de clientes
Vista de página 194
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-41
TABLE 5-15: FRAMEWORK FOR ECOSYSTEM CONDITION BENCHMARKS
Score Condition
0.9-1.0 Fully restored
0.8-0.9 Mostly restored
0.6-0.8 Functional and sustainable
0.4-0.6 Minimally sustainable
0.2-0.4 Declining
0.01-0.2 Fully degraded
After each performance measure was quantified for a given ecological region, an
ecological benefits index was calculated for that region by aggregating the
performance measure values into an equation to produce a single ecological
benefits index value for the region. This provided a means for addressing non-
independence between performance measures and allowed a means for
weighting more important performance measures. The approach is similar to
what is used in the Hydrogeomorphic Method (HGM) for wetland assessment
models (Smith, et. al., 1995; Smith and Wakeley 2001). With HGM, these
equations are used to derive functional capacity indices for evaluating wetlands.
The same approach can be used to derive a single evaluation or benefits value
for a given alternative based on all of the performance measures applicable to a
given ecological region. By applying various mathematical functions to the
equation, the approach provides a means for addressing correlated performance
measures and adjusting performance measure weighting factors. Thus,
interactions that may exist between and among performance measures can be
addressed. The weighting factors applied are for descriptive purposes only, and
should not be construed as a final weighting. The same applies for how
correlated performance measures are handled. The justification for any and all
weighting that may be conducted in the analysis should be documented in detail.
Factors that should be considered when determining performance measure
weighting include uncertainty in hydrologic metrics, degree of development,
calibration, and validation of the PM, degree of justification based on the best
available scientific research, and importance of the PM as an indicator in
shaping the ecosystem.
The equation below provides an example for performance measures that apply to
Lake Okeechobee. If we assume that each is independent of one another, and all
are equally weighted, an ecological benefits index for the lake (EBILO) can be
calculated by aggregating the individual performance measures into an equation
as follows:
EBILO = (QILO-E3 + QILO -E10)/2
Vista de página 194
1 2 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 385 386

Comentários a estes Manuais

Sem comentários